← 22b1

About the Initiative

Building on decades of research to identify cross-system patterns that predict clinical outcomes—enabling earlier detection, better risk stratification, and more targeted intervention.

Our Mission

"To synthesize findings across research domains, identify cross-system patterns that predict clinical outcomes, and translate these insights into evidence-based clinical guidance."

Medicine has advanced through specialization. Cardiologists have mapped the heart. Immunologists have catalogued the immune system. Neuroscientists have traced neural circuits. But patients are not collections of organs—they are integrated systems. And the deepest unsolved problems in medicine often involve cross-system interactions.

The Cross-System Medicine Research Initiative applies systematic analysis across traditionally siloed domains to identify patterns that remain invisible to single-system approaches. When cardiac, immune, and neurological data are analyzed together, certain statistical regularities emerge that correlate with clinical outcomes.

We do not claim to have discovered new biological mechanisms. We claim only that systematic synthesis reveals connections, and those connections generate testable hypotheses for improving patient care.

Our Principles

Honor Existing Research

Every finding emerges from the work of thousands of researchers over decades. We synthesize; we do not claim to discover. Citations are not decoration—they are the foundation.

Pre-Register Everything

All hypotheses are publicly registered before validation attempts. This prevents post-hoc rationalization and ensures findings can be independently evaluated.

Correlations, Not Causations

We identify statistical patterns. We do not claim to know the mechanisms behind them. The "why" behind cross-system correlations remains an open scientific question.

Falsifiability First

Every hypothesis includes clear criteria for refutation. If a prediction fails in an adequately powered study, the hypothesis is rejected. No special pleading.

Humility About Certainty

We present hypotheses, not proofs; risk factors, not destinies; possibilities, not certainties. Clinical implementation requires validation in prospective studies.

Open Collaboration

Validation requires data we do not have. We actively seek collaborators with access to patient cohorts, biobanks, and clinical expertise across domains.

What We Are Not

Important Clarifications
  • Not medical advice. Nothing on this site should be construed as clinical guidance for individual patients. Consult healthcare providers for medical decisions.
  • Not a replacement for clinical trials. Our hypotheses require prospective validation before influencing practice. Pre-registration is not proof.
  • Not a claim of mechanism. We identify correlations. The biological mechanisms underlying these correlations are unknown and require investigation.
  • Not deterministic. Cross-system patterns identify probabilities, not certainties. Risk factors are not destinies.

Methodology Commitment

What We Do

  1. Systematic literature synthesis across research domains
  2. Cross-system pattern identification through computational analysis
  3. Hypothesis generation with specific predictions
  4. Pre-registration of all hypotheses
  5. Collaboration for validation in patient cohorts

How We Evaluate Evidence

We use the GRADE framework for evidence quality:

  • High Multiple RCTs or large cohort studies
  • Moderate Well-designed observational studies
  • Low Case series or limited data
  • Hypothesis Pattern identified, validation needed

Collaborate

Cross-system analysis requires cross-disciplinary collaboration. We seek partners with access to:

Patient Cohorts

Longitudinal data with multi-system measurements for hypothesis validation

Biobank Access

Stored samples for cross-system biomarker analysis

Domain Expertise

Specialists who can evaluate biological plausibility and clinical relevance

View Publications For Clinicians